Work hard and still feel bad? Why being busy doesn’t make you efficient

Life still needs a schedule, and here's why
Founder of the international accelerator and IT platform for business management Business Booster, venture investor, and specialist in mergers and acquisitions of companies.
Photo: Gustavo Fring/Pexels

Working longer hours does not mean achieving better results. You can easily put in 12 to 14 hours, cross off dozens of tasks, and still struggle at the end of the day to answer a simple question: what actually mattered?

This kind of multitasking has become the norm — balancing several projects, or often multiple jobs, at once — and it is precisely what leads to chronic burnout, where tremendous effort yields no sense of completion. Five core principles can resolve this issue: the first three bring order to daily tasks, while the remaining two shift your overall relationship with time.

Batching similar tasks

Chaos usually starts with the little things — emails, calls, and paperwork — that scatter your attention throughout the day. The solution is straightforward: group them by type and assign a dedicated block in your calendar. This eliminates the cognitive tax of context-switching between different tasks, tools, and environments. 

When a small, apparently time-sensitive request pops up, pause to test that assumption: urgency is almost always exaggerated, and the task can safely wait for its designated block alongside the rest.

Photo: Arina Krasnikova/Pexels

An inviolable hour for what really matters

Task-batching is insufficient for major, high-impact work — these initiatives require protected time. Carve out a distinct time slot strictly off-limits to calls, messages, and drop-ins. 

The anxiety over missing a critical emergency is largely unfounded; genuinely urgent matters will reach you even if your communication channels aren’t open 24/7. There is a measurable case for this approach: every interruption takes roughly 20 minutes of lost focus to recover from. 

Read also: The art of doing less: Top 9 laziness concepts from world’s greatest thinkers

Photo: Ben White/Unsplash

Parkinson’s Law also applies: work expands to fill the time allotted for its completion. Assigning two hours to prepare for a negotiation will consume the entire two hours, while a focused thirty-minute slot yields a comparable result. The same dynamic holds for meetings when cut from a standard hour down to thirty minutes.

The priority matrix and its hidden trap

Every task is defined by two dimensions: urgency and importance. Urgent and important tasks are handled immediately. Urgent but unimportant tasks are delegated. Unimportant and non-urgent tasks are eliminated entirely. 

The trap lies in the fourth category: important, but not urgent.

This category is what people postpone most often, even though it has the single greatest long-term impact on results — much like a routine doctor’s visit, which is easy to defer until the issue becomes painful and expensive. 

The divide between those who manage time and those managed by it comes down to how they handle this quadrant: consistently investing in what is important shrinks the stream of urgent fires, while ignoring it keeps you stuck in endless firefighting mode.

Read more: Time is irretrievable and vibe management is the only way to stop wasting it on what machines do better

Life needs a schedule too

Work processes do not naturally safeguard your health or your personal relationships — left unchecked, work will continuously compete for your bandwidth and win. 

The practical fix is to log meals, exercise, and family time into your calendar with the exact same priority as client meetings, rather than leaving them to whatever energy remains. 

Photo: Estée Janssens/Unsplash

A valuable exercise here is mapping out a 15-to-20-year timeline marked with inevitable life milestones: moving, funding education, and caring for ageing relatives. Working backward from that long-term view makes it much easier to define annual goals and convert them into concrete items on your weekly schedule.

Investing without immediate returns

Long-term growth requires time investments that offer no instant gratification: mastering a foreign language takes roughly 500 hours, and progress is virtually imperceptible during the first few weeks. Because of these factors, the brain systematically favours actions with immediate payoffs — one more call, one more minor task with a clear, quick finish. 

To counter this, anchor a dry goal to a vivid emotional outcome: instead of aiming to “complete a course,” picture yourself speaking at a global conference or comfortably reading industry literature in its original language. This mental association sustains momentum when visible progress is still far off.

In case you missed it: World Bank: 10% Productivity Rise Could Create New Jobs in Europe and Central Asia

The true value of these principles is not about squeezing more tasks into your day but about making sure the day actually means something—so that the underlying purpose behind your busy schedule is not lost in the noise.

Related Materials