FIFA has come under fire after making a last-minute scheduling change for a 2026 World Cup match, with critics warning that the decision could expose players and supporters to dangerous temperatures.
The controversy centers on a fixture that was moved to an earlier kickoff time despite forecasts of extreme heat in the host city. Player welfare advocates and football commentators have described the decision as «disgraceful,» arguing that it increases the risk of heat-related illnesses during the tournament.
Medical experts have repeatedly warned that high temperatures and humidity can pose serious health risks to athletes, particularly during high-intensity matches. Concerns have also been raised for fans attending games in outdoor stadiums.
FIFA has defended its scheduling process, saying decisions are made in consultation with local organizers, broadcasters and competition officials. The governing body has also pointed to cooling breaks and other heat-mitigation measures that will be available during the tournament.
However, critics argue that such precautions may not be sufficient if matches are played during the hottest parts of the day. Several players’ unions and supporters’ groups have called for a review of scheduling policies ahead of the World Cup.
The 2026 tournament, which will be hosted by the United States, Canada and Mexico, is expected to be the largest in FIFA history, featuring 48 teams and matches across multiple climate zones.
