FIFA is facing growing criticism from environmental groups and researchers after new studies suggested the 2026 World Cup could become the most polluting tournament in football history. Estimates indicate the competition may generate between 7.8 mln and 9 mln tonnes of carbon dioxide emissions, more than double the footprint of the 2022 World Cup in Qatar.
The tournament, which will be hosted across the United States, Canada and Mexico, will feature a record 48 teams and 104 matches spread across 16 cities. Experts say the vast distances between venues will make air travel the biggest source of emissions, accounting for as much as 87% of the tournament’s carbon footprint.
Environmental campaigners have accused FIFA of prioritising commercial expansion over sustainability. A recent report warned that the governing body’s decision to expand the tournament has significantly increased its climate impact despite the use of existing stadiums.
FIFA has defended its approach, pointing to measures such as public transport initiatives, waste reduction programmes and sustainability plans for host cities. The organisation says it remains committed to cutting emissions and reaching net-zero targets in the coming decades.
However, critics argue that these efforts do not adequately address the environmental consequences of a tournament that will require millions of fans, players and officials to travel across an entire continent. With kickoff approaching, the debate has intensified over whether football’s biggest event can balance global growth with climate responsibility.
